Comparison of Standard and Specialized Readings in Routine Practice for the Assessment of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer on MRI after Biopsy

Purpose@#To retrospectively determine whether specialized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reading performed by an experienced radiologist affected the successful assessment of extraprostatic extension (EPE) in the presence of biopsyrelated hemorrhage after prostate biopsy. @*Materials and Methods@#Two hundred consecutive patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent MRI. General radiologist and subspecialized radiologist readings were unpaired and reviewed in random order by a radiologist who was blinded to patients’ clinical details and histopathologic data. The extent of hemorrhage was assessed on T1-weighted (T1W) MRI using a 1-4 scale, and the likelihood of EPE was assessed for each of the four categories. Histopathologic specimens served as the reference standard. The area under the curve (AUC) of the standard reading was compared to that of the specialized reading. @*Results@#Post-biopsy hemorrhage was subjectively graded as ≥ 3 in 101 patients (50.5%) by standard reading, and in 100 patients (50.0%) by specialized reading.The standard and specialized readings disagreed for 40 (20.7%) of the patients (kappa [κ] = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.48). Of these, specialized reading was the correct interpretation for 21 patients (52.5%). The sensitivity (75% vs. 44%; P = 0.002) and area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) (0.83 vs. 0.67; P = 0.008) of the specialized readings were significantly higher than those of the standard readings, while there was no significant difference in specificity (84% vs. 87%; P = 0.434). @*Conclusion@#The reinterpretation of MRI by experienced radiologists significantly improves the diagnosis of EPE in prostate cancer in the presence of post-biopsy hemorrhage.

The Diagnostic Usefulness of Ultrasound-Guided Peritoneal Biopsy for the Solitary Peritoneal Thickening of an Unknown Cause Visualized as Only Infiltrated Fat Tissue on a CT Scan

PURPOSE@#To assess the usefulness of an ultrasound (US)-guided peritoneal biopsy for the solitary peritoneal thickening visualized as only infiltrated fat on a computed tomography (CT) scan.@*MATERIALS AND METHODS@#This retrospective study included 36 patients (16 males, 20 females; mean age, 51.7 years) who underwent a US-guided biopsy for the solitary peritoneal thickening of unknown cause visualized as only infiltrated fat without an apparent mass formation on a CT scan. The rate of the specific histopathological diagnosis and accuracy for the diagnosis of malignant disease was assessed.@*RESULTS@#The procedure was technically successful with the acquisition of an adequate amount of the specimen for microscopic examination from all patients. A specific histopathological diagnosis was made in 31/36 patients (86.1%): peritoneal carcinomatosis in 15/31 (48.4%), tuberculous peritonitis in 15/31 (48.4%) and panniculitis in 1/31 (3.2%). A non-specific histopathological diagnosis was made in 5/36 (13.9%): chronic inflammation in 4/5 (80%) and mesothelial hyperplasia in 1/5 (20%). The procedure showed sensitivity of 83.3%, with a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, a negative predictive value of 85.7%, and an accuracy rate of 86.1% for the diagnosis of malignant diseases.@*CONCLUSION@#The US-guided peritoneal biopsy is a fairly accurate diagnostic procedure for the peritoneal thickening visualized as only infiltrated fat on a CT scan, and it can be used before performing laparoscopic or an open biopsy.

Late Hepatic Venous Outflow Obstruction Following Inferior Vena Cava Stenting in Patient with Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation Using Modified Piggyback Technique / 대한이식학회지

Following liver transplantation, a few reports have documented hepatic venous outflow obstruction (HVOO) after inferior vena cava (IVC) stenting for the treatment of IVC stenosis. However, HVOO occurred early after IVC stenting and was mostly associated with living donor liver transplantation. Here, we report a case of HVOO that occurred 31 months after IVC stenting in a man who received deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) using a modified piggyback (PB) technique. The cause of HVOO was unclear, but one possible explanation is that the balloon-expandable IVC stent might have compressed the IVC chamber on the donor liver side, which would have changed the outflow hemodynamics, resulting in intimal hyperplasia. Therefore, simultaneous hepatic venous stenting with IVC stent placement could help prevent HVOO in patients receiving DDLT with the modified PB technique.

Atypical Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mimicking Abscess on Multiphasic CT Images and Comparison between Imaging Finding and Gross Specimen

Although multiphasic CT is an efficient technique for determination of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), occasionally, diagnosis of HCC using multiphasic CT can be difficult. Herein we present a case of HCC that was indicative of a typical abscess on CT imaging and compared the image findings with the gross specimen. The patient's body temperature and laboratory results indicated that inflammation were in the normal range. This case emphasizes that not only imaging findings but also clinical presentation should be considered to achieve a correct diagnosis in clinical practice.